Erowid Re-Visioning Survey 1 : members and crew (June 2005)
Submitter Name
Email Address (required only if you want to join a re-visioning discussion list)
How old are you?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Under 10
10-14
15-17
18-22
23-29
30-39
40-49
50-59
60-69
70 or Over
Prefer Not to Answer
How long have you been an Erowid donor/member volunteer/crew?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Not a Donor, Member, Volunteer, or Crew
This is my first year
2 to 3 years
4 or more years
Prefer Not to Answer
Have you ever worked on Erowid, either as a volunteer, editor, triager, paid staff, or otherwise? (not including experience or article submissions)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
I am a current member of the Erowid crew
I am a former member of the Erowid crew
I have done a little volunteer work
I've never worked directly on the Erowid site
Prefer Not to Answer
Have you ever submitted articles, experiences, images, or other content you've written? (not including editing, experience triaging/review, corrections, etc.)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
I have submitted many things to Erowid
I have submitted a few things
I have never submitted content to Erowid
Prefer Not to Answer
Have you participated in any Erowid re-visioning meetings or discussions before this?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Yes
No
Prefer Not to Answer
For the following questions, please think in terms of time and energy spent in the next year. Understand that resources are quite limited.
Pro.Erowid.org : Do you think that Erowid should work on an alternate version of the Erowid.org website that would be designed to suit doctors, lawyers, and researchers? This would include a different look and feel as well as somewhat different interfaces that would be geared towards their interests?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Definitely Yes
Probably Yes
Not sure
Probably Not
Definitely Not
Prefer Not to Answer
User Ratings / Comments: Do you think that Erowid should allow the general visitor to comment publicly on documents and rate them?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Definitely Yes
Probably Yes
Not sure
Probably Not
Definitely Not
Prefer Not to Answer
Subscribe to Topics: Do you think Erowid should work on a system for allowing visitors to subscribe via email or RSS to receive information as it is added to a user-selected list of topics?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Definitely Yes
Probably Yes
Not sure
Probably Not
Definitely Not
Prefer Not to Answer
Image processing : Do you think Erowid should spend time on a system to improve the image submissions system? Reviewing, grading, editing images that are submitted, increasing the number published?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Definitely Yes
Probably Yes
Not sure
Probably Not
Definitely Not
Prefer Not to Answer
Interactions Database : Do you think Erowid should spend time on building a system for collecting and displaying interactions between pharmaceuticals and the psychoactive plants and chemicals Erowid covers?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Definitely Yes
Probably Yes
Not sure
Probably Not
Definitely Not
Prefer Not to Answer
Experiences Improvements : Do you think Erowid should spend time on improving and expanding the Experience Reports system? Including more structured report format alternatives, visitor comments, visitor ratings, heavier cross linking between sections, etc.?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Definitely Yes
Probably Yes
Not sure
Probably Not
Definitely Not
Prefer Not to Answer
Reporter Resources : Do you think Erowid should spend time on developing resources catered to reporters? These would include timely press releases, articles and collections of quotable snippets that provide alternative views, links to references that critique current research and politics, as well as image resources to illustrate stories?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Definitely Yes
Probably Yes
Not sure
Probably Not
Definitely Not
Prefer Not to Answer
For the following questions, please refer to the list on the Re-Visioning June 2005 Overview page.
Top Priorities : Which of the identified projects should be Erowid's top priority?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
add/organize meta data & meta tags
erowid on CD
active portal
institutional subscriptions
office assistant
document Erowid process
code camp
volunteer dev network
doc management overhaul
off-the-shelf cms
pro.erowid.org
small scholarships
e-journal
grants
public health outreach
law enforcement outreach
user ratings
interaction lookup table
blog
steering committees
syndication
image processing system
resources for reporters
U.S. dev resources
targeted fundraising
legitimizing Erowid
subscribe to anything
update site design
internships
flyer
drug snopes
image shopping cart
continuing education
university involvement
trade fair booth
plan for earth & fire demise
art auction
podcast
student paper db
publish successful use models
community groups
oppose criminalization of new drug
fundraising events (concerts/raves)
book
offshore dev
Prefer Not to Answer
Top Priority 2 : Which of the identified projects should be Erowid's second priority?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
add/organize meta data & meta tags
erowid on CD
active portal
institutional subscriptions
office assistant
document Erowid process
code camp
volunteer dev network
doc management overhaul
off-the-shelf cms
pro.erowid.org
small scholarships
e-journal
grants
public health outreach
law enforcement outreach
user ratings
interaction lookup table
blog
steering committees
syndication
image processing system
resources for reporters
U.S. dev resources
targeted fundraising
legitimizing Erowid
subscribe to anything
update site design
internships
flyer
drug snopes
image shopping cart
continuing education
university involvement
trade fair booth
plan for earth & fire demise
art auction
podcast
student paper db
publish successful use models
community groups
oppose criminalization of new drug
fundraising events (concerts/raves)
book
offshore dev
Prefer Not to Answer
Lowest Priority 1 : Which of the identified projects should be Erowid's LOWEST priority?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
add/organize meta data & meta tags
erowid on CD
active portal
institutional subscriptions
office assistant
document Erowid process
code camp
volunteer dev network
doc management overhaul
off-the-shelf cms
pro.erowid.org
small scholarships
e-journal
grants
public health outreach
law enforcement outreach
user ratings
interaction lookup table
blog
steering committees
syndication
image processing system
resources for reporters
us dev resources
targeted fundraising
legitimizing Erowid
subscribe to anything
update site design
internships
flyer
drug snopes
image shopping cart
continuing education
university involvement
trade fair booth
plan for earth & fire demise
art auction
podcast
student paper db
publish successful use models
community groups
oppose criminalization of new drug
fundraising events (concerts/raves)
book
offshore dev
Prefer Not to Answer
Lowest Priority 2 : Which of the identified projects should be Erowid's second LOWEST priority?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
add/organize meta data & meta tags
erowid on CD
active portal
institutional subscriptions
office assistant
document Erowid process
code camp
volunteer dev network
doc management overhaul
off-the-shelf cms
pro.erowid.org
small scholarships
e-journal
grants
public health outreach
law enforcement outreach
user ratings
interaction lookup table
blog
steering committees
syndication
image processing system
resources for reporters
us dev resources
targeted fundraising
legitimizing Erowid
subscribe to anything
update site design
internships
flyer
drug snopes
image shopping cart
continuing education
university involvement
trade fair booth
plan for earth & fire demise
art auction
podcast
student paper db
publish successful use models
community groups
oppose criminalization of new drug
fundraising events (concerts/raves)
book
offshore dev
Prefer Not to Answer
Other Project Ideas This Year : Other than those listed already, what project do you think Erowid should work on in the NEXT YEAR?
Other Project Ideas Long Term: Other than those listed already, what project do you think Erowid should work on over the LONG TERM (3-5 years)?
Should NOT work on : What projects or activities do you feel strongly that Erowid should NOT work on in the next year or two?
Comments: If you have any additional comments about the re-visioning process or this survey, please let us know here!
Individual survey responses are for internal Erowid use only. See also our Privacy Policy .